Joseph Fox probably didn’t utter a syllable of that message. He didn’t have to. It might as well have been chiseled into the wall behind him.
When you take a careful look at the details of the official story presented at David Black’s trial, it crumbles to dust. It’s all impossible.
by Melanie Wilmoth Navarro
For most people, it is difficult to imagine a situation in which you would ever admit to a crime you did not commit. However, psychological research suggests that innocent people do confess. In fact, according to the Innocence Project, in “25% of DNA exoneration cases, innocent defendants made incriminating statements, delivered outright confessions, or pled guilty.”
Anything from abuse or threats from law enforcement to ignorance of the law can make individuals more likely to make a false confession. This video from the Innocence Project gives a brief overview of the issue:
A recent New York Times article by David Shipler examines the role of police interrogation in false confessions. To get a confession, Shipler states, “officers are taught to use all the tricks and lies that courts permit.” Although juveniles, people with mental illnesses or disabilities, and people under the influence of drugs or alcohol are more likely to make false confessions, the average adult can be manipulated into a false confession as well:
In experiments and in interrogation rooms, adults who are told convincing fictions have become susceptible to memories of things that never happened. Rejecting their own recollections through what psychologists call “memory distrust syndrome,” they are tricked by phony evidence into accepting their own fabrications of guilt — an “internalized false confession.” (more…)
by Lisa D’Souza
It seems impossible to imagine confessing to a serious crime that you know you did not commit. That’s why confessions make such great evidence. Juries almost always believe them. And yet, false confessions happen. They usually happen in serious felony cases; 80% of coerced confessions uncovered in one study were obtained in murder investigations. A significant number of the convictions overturned by DNA evidence were based on coerced confessions. Others remain in jail on cases in which DNA evidence exonerates them but based on their confession judges and prosecutors refuse to consider the conviction wrongful.
Young people or people with mental retardation are more susceptible to making a false confessions. Another study found that 63% of false confessors were under the age of 25, and 32% were under 18; yet of all persons arrested for murder and rape, only 8 and 16%, respectively, are juveniles. In a 2005 study at Williams College, students gave false confessions when confronted with manufactured evidence.
Police are trained to interrogate suspects using psychological methods. These interrogation techniques are powerfully coercive and are designed to destroy the suspect’s hope and confidence. Police often lie to suspects about the evidence against them and make false promises about what will happen if they provide a confession. The police, convinced before the interrogation that the suspect is guilty, go to great lengths to obtain a confession. The prosecution is then convinced by the confession that the suspect is guilty.
And that is how many wrongful convictions happen.
Nga Truong spent her 17th, 18th and 19th birthdays in jail after being coerced into confessing that she murdered her infant son. Why would she say she killed her baby when she hadn’t? Read more about Nga Truong at: http://www.npr.org/2012/01/02/144489360/how-a-teens-coerced-confession-set-her-free?sc=fb&cc=fp
Learn more about coerced confessions at: http://falseconfessions.org/false-confessions-happenand at: http://www.truthaboutfalseconfessions.com/