Innocent man finally exonerated

Richard Miles served 14 years in prison for the murder of one man and the attempted murder of another.

Miles’ guilt rested on the testimony of one eyewitness who claimed that he saw Miles shoot two men in a Texaco parking lot. Similar to the Curtis Flowers case, detectives pinpointed Miles and decided that he was guilty within a few hours of the shootings. Miles had an alibi and several individuals who corroborated his story, but that was irrelevant. 

Despite little evidence, Miles was found guilty and sentenced to 60 years in prison.

As of yesterday, however, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals ruled that Richard Miles is officially exonerated.

Unlike most of the exonerations thus far, there was no DNA to test. After it was discovered that prosecutors withheld exculpatory evidence from the defense, Miles was released in 2009 (but not officially exonerated). In 2010, the original eyewitness recanted his testimony, claiming that prosecutors coerced him into identifying Miles as the perpetrator.

Miles is one of many men who have recently been exonerated in Dallas, TX. The stories of several of these men are told in the book “Tested: How Twelve Wrongfully Imprisoned Men Held Onto Hope” by Peyton and Dorothy Budd. MWN

Two Years After Wrongfully Convicted Richard Miles Was Released, He’s Officially Innocent

by Leslie Minora

Free for two years, Richard Miles has nevertheless waited and waited for today — the official acknowledgement that he did not commit the  murder and attempted murder at a Texaco near Bachman Lake in 1994 for which he was sent to prison. The detailed 52-page opinion handed down from the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals reads like the outline of a Hitchcock film, detailing two police reports that weren’t disclosed at the time of Miles’s conviction, a 2010 recantation from the only uninvolved eyewitness and the determination that the small amount of gunshot residue on Miles’ hand was inconclusive. All of which amounted to the decision that the wrong man spent 14 years behind bars.

“When we balance the newly available evidence … with other exculpatory evidence and the evidence of guilt presented at trial, we are satisfied that Applicant has shown by clear and convincing evidence that no rational jury would convict him in light of the new evidence,” reads the court’s opinion released today.

The Dallas County District Attorney’s office recommended Miles’s release in 2009 after they determined that flaws in his trial violated his constitutional rights. Since his release more than two years ago, he’s been working, piecing his life back together and finding support in other exonerees as he waited for a decision from the state court, which must rule on all exoneration cases. But finally, as of today Miles can file for state compensation for his years spent locked up.

“This is going to be great for him because now he can do some of the things he wanted to do” like help his mother, said Charles Chatman, an exoneree who was released in 2008. Chatman and the other exonerees, including Miles, meet monthly, and Chatman tells Unfair Park that he and the other guys have given Miles a helping had since his release.

“We have helped him,” Chatman says, quickly adding that Miles isn’t “the kind of person who just depends on nobody.” Miles has been getting by working at a hotel, Chatman said, but even finding a job was difficult without a declaration of “actual innocence.” 

The state court’s decision comes a year after The Dallas Morning News checked in with him as he continued to await the ruling. Miles was released after Centurion Ministries, a non-profit that explores wrongful convictions, found previously withheld evidence that linked another man to the 1994 murder and compiled evidence in favor of Miles’s innocence.

In a December feature, the Observer explored the complexity of exoneration cases where there is no DNA evidence to definitively prove guilt or innocence. Miles’s case, a non-DNA exoneration, rested squarely on eyewitness testimony, and when the case was explored years later, it was discovered that two police reports were never turned over to the defense, as is required of the prosecution.

Marcus Thurman initially identified Miles as the shooter, but in a 2010 affidavit he admitted that he was somewhat uncertain — and that the prosecutor ignored his uncertainty and directed him to identify Miles by showing where he would be seated in the courtroom, according to the appeals court opinion released today.

Multiple Freedom of Information requests to the Dallas Police Department by Miles’s father and Centurion Ministries resulted in the two reports. The first was of an anonymous caller familiar with the crime who gave police a tip that her ex-boyfriend was the shooter. The second report included information about at altercation between the victims and someone else five days before the shooting.

A 2009 release from the Watkins’s office said that “because the prosecutor is charged with the duty to learn of any favorable  evidence known to others acting on the government’s behalf, such as the investigating law  enforcement agency, and because there is at least a reasonable probability that had the evidence  been timely disclosed to the defense, the result of the proceedings would have been different. Thus, the probability of a different outcome had the information been timely disclosed to the  defense is sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome of the case.”

And now, finally, after two years of freedom without state confirmation of innocence, Miles is not only a free man but a legally recognized innocent man.

3 thoughts on “Innocent man finally exonerated

  1. I am very, very happy for you. My heart still hurts for
    Troy Anthony Davis. I hope all innocent people will be exonerated soon. Good luck, Mr Miles.

  2. Richard Miles’ case reminds us how many unjustly convicted people must still be behind bars because of the public’s overconfidence in the reliability of eyewitness testimony. Many people still think that any innocent people in prison were released as soon as modern DNA technology became available. There is a pattern to the types of errors, omissions, and miscarriages of justice that lead to the false convictions that are familiar to anyone who’s been following Friends of Justice. There’s no reason to believe that false convictions, and sometimes failure to look for perpetrators of serious crimes, has been overlooked completely in a substantial but unknown number of cases.

  3. Pure BS how Dallas police department targets our black males. My uncle Billy Miller was one if the many victims as well. He spent 23 yrs for crimes he didn’t commit as well.

Comments are closed.