C.S. Lewis and the Kavanaugh nomination

71014-_16[1]

In The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe, C.S. Lewis’s classic children’s story, a young girl named Lucy begins telling tales about meeting a faun named Mr. Tumnus in the strange land of Narnia where it is always winter and never Christmas.  What is a faun, you ask?

He was only a little taller than Lucy herself and he carried over his head an umbrella, white with snow.  From the waist upward he was like a man, but his legs were shaped like a goat’s (the hair on them was glossy black) and instead of feet he had goat’s hoofs.  He also had a tail, but Lucy did not notice this at first because it was neatly caught up over the arm that held the umbrella so as to keep it from trailing in the snow.

Mr. Tumnus and LucyLucy is the youngest of four siblings and she says she got into the land of Narnia through an old wardrobe stuffed with fur coats.  Then Edmund, just a little older than Lucy, fumbles his way into Narnia and meets Lucy there.

But when Lucy and Edmund make it back to the earthbound side of the wardrobe, Edmund pretends the whole Narnia business is just a little game he and Lucy were playing.  (Edmund, as you might have guessed, is a little snot.)

Lucy refuses to recant her story, so Susan and Peter, her older sister and brother, decide they must report the matter to the old professor who has opened his weird old country mansion to them while the blitz rages in wartime London.  They are concerned about Lucy and fear she might need the kind of help that is above their pay grade.

The Professor hears Susan and Peter out with admirable patience and then asks a question.  “How do you know that your sister’s story is not true?”

“Oh but–” Susan replies, “Edmund said they had only been pretending.”

“That is a point,” said the Professor, “which certainly deserves consideration; very careful consideration.  For instance–if you will excuse me for asking the question–does your experience lead you to regard your brother or your sister as the most reliable?  I mean, which is the more truthful?”

“That’s the funny thing about it sir,” said Peter.  “Up till now, I’d have said Lucy every time.”

“And what do you think, my dear?” said the Professor, turning to Susan.

“Well,” said Susan, “in general, I’d say the same as Peter, but it couldn’t be true–all this about the wood and the Faun.”

“That is more than I know,” said the Professor,” and a charge of lying against someone whom you have always found truthful is a very serious thing; a very serious thing indeed.”

“We were afraid it mightn’t even be lying,” said Susan; “we thought there might be something wrong with Lucy.”

Madness, you mean?” said the Professor quite coolly.  “Oh, you can make your minds easy about that.  One has only to look at her and talk to her to see that she is not mad.”

“But then,” said Susan, and stopped.  She had never dreamed that a grown-up would talk like the Professor and didn’t know what to think.

“Logic!” said the Professor half to himself.  “Why don’t they teach logic at these schools?  There are only three possibilities.  Either your sister is telling lies, or she is mad, or she is telling the truth.  You know she doesn’t tell lies and it is obvious that she is not mad.  For the moment then and unless any further evidence turns up, we must assume that she is telling the truth.”

Lucy and Christine Blesey Ford have a lot in common.  Both are telling remarkable stories and neither of them can corroborate their claims.  Until recently, most of us took Brett Kavanaugh for just another legal nerd with a love of learning, Catholicism and all things traditional.

So, who do you believe?

There is a broad consensus that Christine Blesey Ford is a convincing witness even if she can’t remember all the details we’d like to hear.

But poor Mr. Kavanaugh is portrayed as an impeccable jurist with his career and reputation on the line.  Why not call it a draw and rule that, as in baseball, a tie goes to the runner.

And that’s where C.S. Lewis’s Professor comes in.  After watching last week’s hearing, which of the two, Blesey Ford or Kavanaugh, strikes you as the most reliable?  I mean, which is the most truthful?

Professor Blesey Ford never pretended that her memory of that fateful evening is complete.  There are a lot of things she doesn’t remember. But she knows she was sexually assaulted, and she knows Brett Kavanaugh was the laughing boy with his full weight pressing down on her and his hand over her mouth.

And then there’s Brett Kavanaugh.  At the hearing he was petulant, bizarre, rude, distracted, disingenuous, disrespectful and captive to his own rage.

Both of the people answering questions were operating under unspeakable pressure, and it showed.

Both Blesey Ford and Kavanaugh must live out their lives as symbols of controversy.  But one was consistent, eloquent, polite and poised; the other was wild-eyed, wired and consistently evasive.

Both had a lot to lose; only one of them had anything to gain.

Kavanaugh supporters don’t want to say his accuser is lying, but they imply she is confused.  Somebody molested her, but her addled mind has placed Brett Kavanaugh at the scene of the crime when he clearly wasn’t there because, as he never tires of reminding us, he is too hard-working, religious, athletic, academically gifted and disciplined to have done anything of the kind.

In other words, there must be something wrong with Professor Blesey Ford.  She doesn’t appear to be crazy, but if Kavanaugh is telling the truth, there is no other alternative.

Except that she isn’t crazy.  As the Lewis’s Professor would put it, “one has only to look at her and talk to her to see that she is not mad.”

There are only three possibilities: Either she is telling intentional lies, or she is mad, or she is telling the truth.

Two of the three simply ain’t so.

So, “for the moment then and unless any further evidence turns up, we must assume that she is telling the truth.”

 

 

 

 

6 thoughts on “C.S. Lewis and the Kavanaugh nomination

  1. “…we must assume that she is telling the truth.” Really? Why must we assume that she is telling the truth and not that Kavanaugh is telling the truth? No evidence or other witnesses or anything else support her claims. If it is your opinion that she is telling the truth (because that’s what you chose to believe – regardless of the facts), then please state that. Don’t tell me and your readers that we MUST assume that she is telling the truth. And we are to do this because of Lucy and Narnia? I wish that you would have given your opinion with the disclaimer that that was all it was – your opinion. And you could also follow that up with the fact that you don’t believe that he would make a good Supreme Court Justice because you disagree with him on this _____ (fill in the blank) issue. I would have much more respect for you then. You see, I would believe you then. But I don’t believe that you think that he wouldn’t make a good Justice because some woman made an unsubstantiated claim about him when he was 17 year old. Own up to what your real issue(s) with Kavanagh is/are.

  2. Okay, Voice of Reason, if you choose to believe Edmund over Lucy that’s on you. But, remember, he’s a little snot.

  3. Kavanaugh demonstrated that he is a partisan hack, pushing conspiracy theories and exhibiting a demeanor that many believe is inappropriate for a judge on the highest court in the land. Also, the only one who was clearly hedging the truth was Kavanaugh, based on the writings of several former classmates and colleagues. Interestingly there are research data that indicate the more vehement the denials, the more likely the guilt. As the saying goes “The stronger the words, the weaker the argument. I would also tend to believe Trump’s and Clinton’s accusers.

  4. Alan, this is reality. Not fantasy/fiction.
    I just wish that people would be real/honest with everyone, as well as with themselves. Did you support the Kavanaugh nomination before the allegations? If you did not support him from the start, then say that. Don’t say things like “I believe her more than I believe him” or “his reaction to the accusations prove that he is unfit to be on the Supreme Court”. Tell the truth. Would you like for me to show you how it is done? Ok, I will. I support the Kavanaugh nomination because I am a staunch constitutionalist and believe that he would make rulings based upon the Constitution and law. That’s what every Supreme Court Justice is supposed to do! I would not support anyone who re-interprets the Constitution and law into what they believe it should say. No one should. I would have withdrawn my support for him if any of the allegations were proved to be valid. But they were not. There you go. It feels good to say (write) how you really feel. Try it.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s