Bobby Ray Dixon (pictured to the left) and Phillip Bivens are free. Thirty years ago, the two men confessed to the brutal rape and murder of Eva Gail Patterson in Mississippi. A third man, Larry Ruffin, was also wrongfully convicted in this case, but died in prison eight years ago.
Sophisticated DNA tests, unavailable when Dixon, Bivens and Ruffin were arrested three decades ago, prove conclusively that these three men are innocent of wrongdoing.
At trial, prosecutors had little evidence to offer apart from the confessions the three men made to investigators. The confessions were later recanted. But jurors found it impossible to believe that innocent suspects would cop to a crime they didn’t commit–even for a brief moment.
Why did the three men implicate themselves? (more…)

Michelle Alexander says the criminal justice reform movement should shed its fixation with innocence. In her groundbreaking book, The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness, Alexander suggests that reformers start focusing on normal defendants. Since most criminal defendants done the deed, that means going to bat for guilty people. Why would we want to do that? 

New York Times Columnist
Judge John Miller and County Attorney Val Varley are locked in a neck-and-neck race to see who qualifies as the most bizarre public official in the great state of Texas. Since a subscription is required, I have copied the story from the 

