The evidentiary hearing in the case of Troy Davis has come and gone.
If Mr. Davis is now guilty until proven innocent, Patrick Rodgers thinks his lawyers have little cause for rejoicing. The waters are just as muddy now as they have ever been.
But is this process just about the guilt or innocence of Troy Davis? I don’t think so. In fact, I predict that the State of Georgia will be unable to execute Troy Davis. Why? Too many people either think he is innocent or distrust the investigation underlying this case. When that happens, the criminal justice system freezes up.
Supreme Court Justice Anton Scalia painted the Supreme Court into a constitutional corner when he made this stunning observation:
“This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is ‘actually’ innocent. We have repeatedly left that question unresolved, while expressing considerable doubt that any claim based on alleged ‘actual innocence’ is constitutionally cognizable.”
Scalia apparently think that’s okay. Most Americans would disagree . . . if they were paying attention.
The trouble with the Davis case is that so many people are paying attention. Normally, the Alice in Wonderland character of the legal system goes unnoticed. When a case gains widespread attention, a tipping point is reached. The Davis case tipped a long time ago.
JUNE 29, 2010
Sound and fury: The Troy Davis hearing
Patrick Rodgers
Twenty years in the making, last week’s proceeding didn’t seem to clarify anything.
In a city with a reputation for celebrating the intersection between odd personalities and true crime drama, last week’s evidentiary hearings for Troy Davis did not disappoint.
There were remorseless convicts correcting the state’s legal team about prior arrests; wild–haired old ladies reflecting out loud (to no one in particular) about the distant past; tense moments implicating possible police malfeasance; and a court room audience that did not hesitate to emote audibly as various witnesses were questioned.
“We don’t usually have this much excitement in the courtroom,” I overheard a member of the court staff say while waiting for Wednesday morning’s session to convene.
It was expected to be a circus – after all, the case has grown from local tragedy to international controversy over the last few years. The Pope and the French government, among others, have even taken sides.
Media, special interest groups and curious observers all gathered to catch a glimpse of the proceedings.
In front of the court house dozens of high school and college students gathered to assist Amnesty International and the NAACP with a rally, waving signs, chanting and passing out fliers. The atmosphere was electric. (more…)








